This article was downloaded by: [New York University]
On: 30 November 2014, At: 18:37
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Computer-Aided Design and Applications
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tcad20
Simulation Methods in the Foot Orthosis Development
Samuel J. Lochnera, Jan P. Huissoona & Sanjeev S. Bedia a University of Waterloo
Published online: 10 Jun 2014.
To cite this article: Samuel J. Lochner, Jan P. Huissoon & Sanjeev S. Bedi (2014) Simulation Methods in the Foot Orthosis
Development Process, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 11:6, 608-616, DOI: 10.1080/16864360.2014.914375
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2014.914375
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http:// www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions 608
Simulation Methods in the Foot Orthosis Development Process
Samuel J. Lochner, Jan P. Huissoon, Sanjeev S. Bedi
University of Waterloo, email@example.com
Traditional methods for developing foot orthoses require extensive skilled manual labor. More modern methods have sought to address this with the introduction of computer enabled technologies such as digital scanning, computer aided design, and automated manufacturing. The current work further advances the process with the introduction of an additional computer enabled technology, simulation models, into two additional steps. First, a simulation model is used to achieve the postural adjustments to the foot normally done by a practitioner. This has the benefit of further automating the process, improving repeatability, and preventing the deformation of the plantar soft tissues that normally occurs with physical postural adjustment. Second, the simulation model is used in a routine to optimize plantar pressure distribution. When compared to a conventional method, the proposed approach yielded a 61% reduction in peak plantar pressure. Future work includes automating the optimization routines for a variety of metrics. Other applications for the current work include the development processes of orthoses and prostheses for other parts of the body.
Keywords: foot orthosis, finite element, simulation, optimization. 1. INTRODUCTION
A foot orthoses (FO) is intended to prevent injury or aid in recovery by acting to redistribute pressure experienced by the plantar surface of the foot and/or cause adjustments to relative bone positions during standing and gait. FO geometry originates from a duplicate of the plantar foot surface and then geometrical deviations are made to this base shape in order to control how the FO influences plantar pressure and foot posture. Methods for developing FOs can be categorized as either traditional or modern, where traditional methods rely on manual techniques and modern methods include new computer enabled technologies. 1.1. Traditional FO Development Methods
A variety of paradigms for controlling posture exist, the earliest being that proposed by Merton Root in the 1970’s . While Root’s methods have been questioned or criticized [15,23], they still form the predominant theory known and practiced today. Though the current work could be adapted to a variety of different postural control paradigms, it will be adapted here to Root’s approach. Traditional methods following Root’s techniques and those later described in greater detail by J.W. Philps in, “The Functional FO”  can be summarized and broken down into the following five steps: 1. Patient assessing: The practitioner examines the patient while non weight bearing and during standing and gait. Any pathologies are noted and appropriate orthotic interventions recommended. The tibial stance, subtalar joint, and midtarsal joint angles are measured with the subtalar joint in the neutral position and the midtarsal joint locked to arrive at the ideal midstance rearfoot and forefoot angles. Various characteristics of the FO are decided at this point such as the FO’s type, materials, and any local regions requiring decreased pressure. The definitions for the angular measurements are as follows: • The tibial stance angle is measured in the frontal plane as the angle between a line bisecting the lower leg and vertical during standing. • The subtalar joint angle is measured in the frontal plane as the angle between the lower leg bisection line and a line bisecting the calcaneus.
Computer-Aided Design & Applications, 11(6), 2014, 608–616, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2014.914375 c© 2014 CAD Solutions, LLC, http://www.cadanda.com
D ow nl oa de d by [N ew
Y or k U niv ers ity ] a t 1 8:3 7 3 0 N ov em be r 2 01 4 609 • The midtarsal joint angle is measured in the frontal plane as the angle between a line connecting the metatarsal joints along the plantar surface of the foot and the calcaneus bisection line. • The rearfoot angle is the addition of the tibial stance angle and the subtalar joint angle.